I agree that homedecor mustn't be added entierely.
For the vanilla experience, i agree in general but mobile experience is not same as desktop experience. Mobile users are generally another population and a meta-packaging could be better for them to discover minetest.
FOSS gamedev and creative worlds
This is a mostly frozen copy of the Minetest forums through 2017. If you know phpBB3 and would like to host any G-rated forum here, you can email: me@minetest.org If the email doesn't work, find out who's taken over Final Minetest from OldCoder and email them to get write access or an admin account.
I should have set this up years ago. But it's no tale of woe.
Whether the temperature is high or low, regardless of cold winds blow,
away we go like Edgar Allan Poe, on now with the show. BTW rhymes are welcome.
Search found 48 matches
- Thu Mar 19, 2015 09:30
- Forum: Minetest General
- Topic: Making an attractive Android game
- Replies: 37
- Views: 7021
Re: Making an attractive Android game
Thanks for the report. I also think some content mods must be added.
I will look at mobs performance on Android before adding it
I will look at mobs performance on Android before adding it
- Tue Mar 17, 2015 14:34
- Forum: Minetest General
- Topic: Making an attractive Android game
- Replies: 37
- Views: 7021
Making an attractive Android game
Hello, as you know, we are now on Android, with official binaries provided for Google Play Store and later on F-Droid. For majority of our online players, modding is done server-side, and many of you are modding your client-side version of minetest_game to improve your gameplay experience. Somes als...
- Tue Mar 17, 2015 10:31
- Forum: Minetest General
- Topic: Making an attractive Android game
- Replies: 37
- Views: 7021
Re: [0.4.12] Official Android build on Google Play
The problem is normally solved with 0.4.12.10 release.
- Mon Mar 16, 2015 11:16
- Forum: Minetest News
- Topic: [0.4.12] Official Android build on Google Play and F-Droid
- Replies: 44
- Views: 15966
Re: Official Android build on Google Play
Warning, play store signature is wrong and the package name was also wrong. Everything is fixed in 0.4.12.7 but please fix the link, the application will be available here when Google will validate it:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/deta ... t.minetest
https://play.google.com/store/apps/deta ... t.minetest
- Sat Mar 14, 2015 18:03
- Forum: Minetest News
- Topic: [0.4.12] Official Android build on Google Play and F-Droid
- Replies: 44
- Views: 15966
Re: C++11
We must keep the compat with old compilers like Debian Squeeze, but if we need to do a break, maybe 0.5 or 0.6 can do this. 0.5 do the network rework, maybe we can think about C++11 ? std::mutex, std::regex, that's two functions i need to use to replace our current working but obsolete implementatio...
- Thu Mar 05, 2015 22:15
- Forum: Minetest Engine
- Topic: C++11
- Replies: 31
- Views: 10244
Re: [HEADS-UP] Minetest incompatibility changes in the futur
Network layer, protocol will evolve and we couldn't maintain old versions because we need to rework on some engine functions. Colored chat can cause problems too
If you are local only you are not affected by this change
If you are local only you are not affected by this change
- Fri Feb 27, 2015 13:19
- Forum: Minetest News
- Topic: [HEADS-UP] Minetest incompatibility changes in the future
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3551
[HEADS-UP] Minetest incompatibility changes in the future
Hello to our users, 0.4.12 is now out and we are working on a 0.5.0 minetest, which mean some breaks will happen into the minetest core. The first objective of this 0.5.0 is to solve network protocol issues and rework the network layer of minetest to improve its performance and its flexiblity. This ...
- Sat Feb 21, 2015 15:51
- Forum: Minetest News
- Topic: [HEADS-UP] Minetest incompatibility changes in the future
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3551
Re: [0.4.12] Release Candidate builds
No Krock, network code isn't in 0.4.12, it's on master only
- Tue Feb 17, 2015 18:54
- Forum: Minetest News
- Topic: [0.4.12] Release Candidate builds
- Replies: 11
- Views: 4096
Re: Server crash with "Assertion failed"
Thanks for your report. I'm waiting for the next assertion failed, i got the same.
- Sun Feb 15, 2015 08:39
- Forum: Minetest Problems
- Topic: Server crash with "Assertion failed"
- Replies: 2
- Views: 497
Re: PR 2227
Commited
- Thu Feb 12, 2015 09:03
- Forum: Minetest Features
- Topic: PR 2227
- Replies: 11
- Views: 1446
Re: PR 2227
Because many users are not on IRC or github, i would talk with users about this graphical change before merge. It seems good for me, but maybe community can talk with us because it's user experience, not only devel.
- Thu Feb 12, 2015 06:49
- Forum: Minetest Features
- Topic: PR 2227
- Replies: 11
- Views: 1446
PR 2227
Hi,
I want to discuss about PR 2227. The PR seems interesting but i need end user opinion before merge.
Can you review https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pull/2227 ?
I let this discussion opened until 48 hours before merge, but if somes doesn't like, tell me
I want to discuss about PR 2227. The PR seems interesting but i need end user opinion before merge.
Can you review https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pull/2227 ?
I let this discussion opened until 48 hours before merge, but if somes doesn't like, tell me
- Wed Feb 11, 2015 19:25
- Forum: Minetest Features
- Topic: PR 2227
- Replies: 11
- Views: 1446
Re: Home Screen Bug v0.4.11
Confirmed present in master
- Wed Feb 11, 2015 19:00
- Forum: Minetest Problems
- Topic: Home Screen Bug v0.4.11
- Replies: 3
- Views: 637
Re: [Mod] Simple Money [economy]
It works very well but we need to improve performance a little to reduce CPU usage on server. actually HUD is updated in world loop process, but we need to change it per event.
If i get time i'll look at this today
If i get time i'll look at this today
- Tue Feb 10, 2015 08:33
- Forum: Mod Releases
- Topic: [Mod] Simple Money [economy]
- Replies: 17
- Views: 4341
Re: RFC: Changes in organization
Good idea, PR mustn't been blocked because of other PR.
- Mon Feb 09, 2015 15:24
- Forum: Minetest General
- Topic: RFC: Changes in organization
- Replies: 15
- Views: 3288
Re: RFC: Changes in organization
Wuzzy, originator = author. Issue needs response from minetest developers, it's a ticket which needs to be answered if possible
- Sun Feb 08, 2015 08:36
- Forum: Minetest General
- Topic: RFC: Changes in organization
- Replies: 15
- Views: 3288
Re: RFC: Changes in organization
For PR cleanup, you can look at here: https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pu ... +is%3Aopen
Maybe some old issues can be kept because they are pertinent but many old PR are unmergeable or useless.
Thanks for the post celeron55.
Maybe some old issues can be kept because they are pertinent but many old PR are unmergeable or useless.
Thanks for the post celeron55.
- Sat Feb 07, 2015 17:45
- Forum: Minetest General
- Topic: RFC: Changes in organization
- Replies: 15
- Views: 3288
- Search found 48 matches • Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2