Razor wrote:instead, could I have this for Christmas please? http://www.minecraftskins.com/skin/639332/santa-claus-joe/
aldobr wrote:"if you dont i will have you banned"
Pls whatever you do, make sure to clear up that information :
Is Neuro a moderator ?
Neuro wrote:cactuz i need you to ban this person he is going around killing ppl because someone griefed his house and he didnt choose to report it, i told him to stop and you can see his response in the screenshot
martinmb126 wrote:Dearr Cactuz,
Could you please protect my City again ??? I have to extend it a little bit...
The NEW cords are: (192 , 30000 , 6775) and (385 , -30000 , 6198)
THANK YOU :-)
Neuro wrote:is it possible to make a clear skin?
cactuz_pl wrote:Neuro wrote:is it possible to make a clear skin?
I guess this is possible and I'm think this would be better camouflage than stone-skin.
Here is the link to the transparent skin which I made.
Licence: WTFPL :)
Redcrab, I was thinking about our skin collecting, and came to the conclusion that it was better to add them to the public (/settexture) instead of assign them to players.
Ade96 wrote:cactuz_pl wrote:Neuro wrote:is it possible to make a clear skin?
I guess this is possible and I'm think this would be better camouflage than stone-skin.
Here is the link to the transparent skin which I made.
Licence: WTFPL :)
Redcrab, I was thinking about our skin collecting, and came to the conclusion that it was better to add them to the public (/settexture) instead of assign them to players.
But if everyone's skin goes to /settexture list, anyone can start to use your own skin and many people will have same skin. Isn't it better if everyone has own skin?
irksomeduck wrote:Server is down :/
cactuz_pl wrote:Player 'irksomeduck' has been banned.
Reason: Greifing road and Insane's pig.
I know only about these two greifs but all actions of this player has been rolled back.
Michael Eh? wrote:It seems that the protection didn't go through with the first request.
Hi I would like to protect my area - chess board
owner : MichaelEh
coordinates : from (-2516,-30000,-2080) to (-2569,30000,-2224)
cactuz_pl wrote:irksomeduck wrote:Server is down :/
Server is fine.cactuz_pl wrote:Player 'irksomeduck' has been banned.
Reason: Greifing road and Insane's pig.
I know only about these two greifs but all actions of this player has been rolled back.
cactuz_pl wrote:
From now, every confirmed greif will be punish by ban.
Excuses such as:
- "Someone hack into my account and greif."
- "My friend played using my account greif."
Will not be taken into account.
You are responsible for your own accounts. Keep your passwords safe, don't share them. If someone greif using your account that's only your fault and your account will be banned for that.
Anyone can destroy a few buildings and then say "That wasn't me".
"Pity for the guilty is treason to the innocent."
cactuz_pl wrote:To Obiewan1111 and irksomeduck.cactuz_pl wrote:
From now, every confirmed greif will be punish by ban.
Excuses such as:
- "Someone hack into my account and greif."
- "My friend played using my account greif."
Will not be taken into account.
You are responsible for your own accounts. Keep your passwords safe, don't share them. If someone greif using your account that's only your fault and your account will be banned for that.
Anyone can destroy a few buildings and then say "That wasn't me".
"Pity for the guilty is treason to the innocent."
Edit: Original post.
cactuz_pl wrote:To Obiewan1111 and irksomeduck.cactuz_pl wrote:
From now, every confirmed greif will be punish by ban.
Excuses such as:
- "Someone hack into my account and greif."
- "My friend played using my account greif."
Will not be taken into account.
You are responsible for your own accounts. Keep your passwords safe, don't share them. If someone greif using your account that's only your fault and your account will be banned for that.
New members that see this post, Keep in mind that you have to read EVERY SINGLE page for new rule updates. Uhh... This was 8+ pages from the initial first page, so if you want people to see this, then it should be on the first page. Plus, your quote just says about people saying it wasn't them. I am agreeing to destroying a few panes of glass, but no, I didn't grief. And I am generally sorry for this misunderstanding.
My criticism is that each rule should be clearly and concisely presented on the front page, so all new people are able to see it, like myself. Which was the wrong case..
Anyone can destroy a few buildings and then say "That wasn't me".
"Pity for the guilty is treason to the innocent."
Edit: Original post.
"Ignorance of the law does not exempt from its application"
Acquittal would be fair to ignore the players who are in the first place, because without them, this server does not have to make sense.
Redcrab could you add "No mercy law" to the first page?
(If you agree with if, of course. If not, I will unban these players if you want).
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests