Page 1 of 1

[Solved] Best OS for server?

PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 22:13
by jpenguin
I currently run Ubuntu 12.04 (no gui) for my 0.42rc1 server

Your phone or window isn't wide enough to display the code box. If it's a phone, try rotating it to landscape mode.
Code: Select all
apt-get install build-essential libirrlicht-dev cmake libbz2-dev libpng12-dev libjpeg8-dev libxxf86vm-dev libgl1-mesa-dev libsqlite3-dev libogg-dev libvorbis-dev libopenal-dev
wget https://github.com/celeron55/minetest/tarball/master -O master.tar.gz
tar xf master.tar.gz
cd celeron55-minetest-286edd4 (or similar)
cd games/
wget https://github.com/celeron55/minetest_game/tarball/master -O master.tar.gz
tar xf master.tar.gz
mv celeron55-minetest_game-* minetest_game
cd ..
cmake . -DRUN_IN_PLACE=0 -DBUILD_CLIENT=0 -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release
make -j2
make install


However, I am considering upgrading to a VPS with more RAM and more CPU cores. Should I stick with ubuntu or try Arch, Gentoo, CentOS 6.2 or Fedora 16? Will it make a difference?

PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 22:25
by madchicken13
Stick with Ubuntu Because Ubuntu Uses less Resources than CentOS or Fedora
Gentoo, Arch IDK

PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 22:44
by pagliaccio
jpenguin wrote:I currently run Ubuntu 12.04 (no gui) for my 0.42rc1 server

Your phone or window isn't wide enough to display the code box. If it's a phone, try rotating it to landscape mode.
Code: Select all
apt-get install build-essential libirrlicht-dev cmake libbz2-dev libpng12-dev libjpeg8-dev libxxf86vm-dev libgl1-mesa-dev libsqlite3-dev libogg-dev libvorbis-dev libopenal-dev
wget https://github.com/celeron55/minetest/tarball/master -O master.tar.gz
tar xf master.tar.gz
cd celeron55-minetest-286edd4 (or similar)
cd games/
wget https://github.com/celeron55/minetest_game/tarball/master -O master.tar.gz
tar xf master.tar.gz
mv celeron55-minetest_game-* minetest_game
cd ..
cmake . -DRUN_IN_PLACE=0 -DBUILD_CLIENT=0 -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release
make -j2
make install


However, I am considering upgrading to a VPS with more RAM and more CPU cores. Should I stick with ubuntu or try Arch, Gentoo, CentOS 6.2 or Fedora 16? Will it make a difference?


ubuntu or debian is best.

arch is few stable, too upgrade but is light. fedora idem

PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 22:54
by jpenguin
Thanks, I just keep ubuntu then

PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 23:01
by madchicken13
Yep

PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 00:07
by Menche
My servers run debian.

PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 00:30
by madchicken13
Yea All 6 of my servers run on Ubuntu

PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 06:41
by Calinou
WINDOWS 8 BEST SERVER EVER

j/k ;)
Personally I'd say Debian. Ubuntu isn't really for servers and is less stable than Debian.

PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 09:17
by xyz
jpenguin wrote:
Your phone or window isn't wide enough to display the code box. If it's a phone, try rotating it to landscape mode.
Code: Select all
make install

You're doing it wrong. Either use -D_RUN_IN_PLACE=1 or do checkinstall instead of make install to build package.

PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 10:22
by mauvebic
I like arch because theyre code-nazies lol ive never installed a program that didn't work. But, the update process is hell, even moreso with proprietary drivers.

Debian is definately stable, and with the size of the userbase you can expect fixes quick enough, but its no racehorse for single-processor systems either :-/

I have a dual boot system (lin + lin) so im thinking of trying zenwalk next :-p

though ultimately what makes the greatest difference is how you use the system. If you use a WM like compiz or gnome3, you're gonna get roughly the same performance regardless of dist.

PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 12:56
by Jordach
Calinou wrote:
WINDOWS 8 BEST SERVER EVER

j/k ;)
Personally I'd say Debian. Ubuntu isn't really for servers and is less stable than Debian.

I have tried Wndows 8 x86 and so far, it has not used anymore resoures than Windows XP, SP2. So it works for a speedy server.

PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 13:13
by Calinou
Jordach wrote:I have tried Wndows 8 x86 and so far, it has not used anymore resoures than Windows XP, SP2. So it works for a speedy server.


But, Windows sucked, sucks and will suck, and it's paid and proprietary.

PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 16:36
by jpenguin
@Calinou I'm running withoutt a GUI, although allgamer offers VPS's with gnome and xfce! Ubuntu may be a tad less stable than debian, but it;s an LTS release I'm pusing

@mauvebic At home, I run kubuntu as my main OS, have a second HDD- Im always trying a new distro

@xyz-- it's just a matter of preference, and I started with the PPA, so I already set up for a system-wide install

@jordach-- M$ did learn from Vista, 7 & 8 are decent- but a GUI does use extra RAM & CPU and windows itself is kinda bloated and has security issues.

PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 16:55
by pagliaccio
don't talk of windows!

if you want crash, bug or unsecurity is your O.S.

if you want a stable and security OS linux is the best. you can start linux widout interface, only terminal for pure server.

PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 17:24
by xyz
jpenguin wrote: it's just a matter of preference, and I started with the PPA, so I already set up for a system-wide install

No, make install is always wrong. Except if you're not using any package manager.

PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 17:42
by jpenguin
well then, I'll change that when the upgrade haappens