[5px] Soft Textures | Tweaked Default Textures
Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2014 23:59FOSS gamedev and creative worlds
FOSS gamedev and creative worlds
https://forums.minetest.org/
[5px] Soft Textures | Tweaked Default Textures
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2014 23:59
Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2014 11:54great job! I like simple texture packs but i don't like ones where its so simple each texture is one colour (it kinda disorientates me XD), this is different though.
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2014 04:07Excellent work squeezing a huge amount from just 5 pixels. I like how pleasant it feels. Very nice.
Posted: Thu Apr 17, 2014 09:43Nice. First TP for Minetest I've seen that I would call "soft".
Posted: Thu Apr 17, 2014 11:40Btw, why is this not a [2^X px] texture pack?
4 or 8 px would be much more common.
4 or 8 px would be much more common.
Posted: Thu Apr 17, 2014 11:56Why not? What if you wanted something in between?Krock wrote:Btw, why is this not a [2^X px] texture pack?
4 or 8 px would be much more common.
Posted: Thu Apr 17, 2014 12:05Evergreen wrote:Why not? What if you wanted something in between?Krock wrote:Btw, why is this not a [2^X px] texture pack?
4 or 8 px would be much more common.
They don't resize well.
Maybe some people like it this "wrong" way, I don't know.
Posted: Thu Apr 17, 2014 12:39hm, I didn't notice that.Krock wrote:Evergreen wrote:Why not? What if you wanted something in between?Krock wrote:Btw, why is this not a [2^X px] texture pack?
4 or 8 px would be much more common.
http://i.imgur.com/8JqtQzJ.png
They don't resize well.
Maybe some people like it this "wrong" way, I don't know.
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2014 23:15Krock wrote:Btw, why is this not a [2^X px] texture pack?
4 or 8 px would be much more common.
because [2^X px] is too mainstream /jk
i like 3px and 5px tp :)
Krock wrote:http://i.imgur.com/8JqtQzJ.png
They don't resize well.
Maybe some people like it this "wrong" way, I don't know.
Thats why this tp is also called "Drunk texture pack"
For me it works:
Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2014 00:47OpenGL / D3D need to be good enough - although I'm sure it's caused by D3D and not OGL.AspireMint wrote:Krock wrote:Btw, why is this not a [2^X px] texture pack?
4 or 8 px would be much more common.
because [2^X px] is too mainstream /jk
i like 3px and 5px tp :)Krock wrote:http://i.imgur.com/8JqtQzJ.png
They don't resize well.
Maybe some people like it this "wrong" way, I don't know.
Thats why this tp is also called "Drunk texture pack"
For me it works:
http://i.imgur.com/BCql0WI.png
Re: [5px] Soft Textures | Tweaked Default Textures
Posted: Sun Apr 20, 2014 03:24Excellent textures!
*Enke, being somewhat untalented, wonders if doing low-res textures is a good way to jump in to it. Enke also wonders if he should try an ASCII TP.
*Enke, being somewhat untalented, wonders if doing low-res textures is a good way to jump in to it. Enke also wonders if he should try an ASCII TP.
Re: [5px] Soft Textures | Tweaked Default Textures
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 00:35Thank you for the very nice texture pack! It really brought a new look to my world. :)