FOSS gamedev and creative worlds

Hey guys, it's me again. I've been quite busy recently and still don't really have time for Minetest.
I fired it up for the first time in ages a bit ago, and was shocked at how (I don't know, plastic?) the world felt.

From my experience, ambient occlusion greatly affects the level of realism of a 3D scene, so I played around with the values in mapblock_mesh.cpp until I found something that seemed to look nice.

In my opinion, this really enhances the vibrancy of the scene. Thoughts?
Do you guys think this looks better or worse?

Screenshot with default values:

Screenshot with modified values:

To play with it yourself, replace line 294 in mapblock_mesh.cpp with this and recompile:
Note, this value is a ballpark estimate, and is quite subject to change.


(Sorry, had to use a different image hosting site. China now blocks mediacru.sh. :/)

You need to link directly to the image, you're linking to an page with the image on it.

rubenwardy wrote:You need to link directly to the image, you're linking to an page with the image on it.

From here, those are direct links and are working fine. What do you see?

You linked to http://postimg.org/image/vyqmkzdrn/ instead of http://s13.postimg.org/s2daozss7/screen ... 476750.png
I just see crosses.

rubenwardy wrote:You linked to http://postimg.org/image/vyqmkzdrn/ instead of http://s13.postimg.org/s2daozss7/screen ... 476750.png
I just see crosses.

That's strange, there seems to be some sort of URL filtering then. The actual link I posted is http://s13.postimg.org/3ymj0pab9/screen ... 476750.png

I'll try a different site.

Just uploading as attachments. That redirects, too.

rubenwardy wrote:Just uploading as attachments. That redirects, too.

Ah right, thanks.
</offtopic>

Also, please note that the code used was quite hacky and looks bad in pretty much every situation except daylight.

Impressive. I like this change.

Darker shadows? It does look better. With dynamic shadows, it will look even cooler.

I like it! +1

Ideally, ambient occlusion strength should be configurable. The default value should probably be slightly higher than what we currently have.

Calinou wrote:Ideally, ambient occlusion strength should be configurable. The default value should probably be slightly higher than what we currently have.

That's a neat idea, perhaps subgames could modify it in their configuration files. That would probably help give each game a sort of feel.

However, first someone has to figure out/rewrite the current system. I still can't wrap my head around how it works exactly, or how to fix the issues with caves and water and such.

EDIT: So this line apparently affects darkness well, but it looks like someone tweaked it to be very exact. Any info?

I've updated the main post with a modification to the light_amount array, which looks roughly the same, but works perfectly underwater and in caves.

Now to make it configurable...

This has been added to the main game, with a lot of tweaks. See the setting "ambient_occlusion_gamma".

Well I am the goon who voted "No real difference",
but I am half blind and using a tiny computer and from the screen shots
I really didnt see much of a difference.

But man in game it looks awesome, good job TriBlade9.
Its the little things you know :)

Napiophelios wrote:Well I am the goon who voted "No real difference",
but I am half blind and using a tiny computer and from the screen shots
I really didnt see much of a difference.

But man in game it looks awesome, good job TriBlade9.
Its the little things you know :)

No problem, glad you like it!
Just out of curiosity, what values are you using?

Whatever Krock has as the default in his latest build;
(If I dont understand something,I try not to mess with it)

Its really noticeable effect when viewing things from high altitudes

Napiophelios wrote:Whatever Krock has as the default in his latest build;
(If I dont understand something,I try not to mess with it)

Its really noticeable effect when viewing things from high altitudes

Strange, in the latest builds the default is exactly the same as previously. (Should be anyways)

I dont know but when you fly around the landscape kinda shimmers, especially tree leaves
Its kinda weird lookin but neat.

Does #display_gamma = 1.8 have anything to do with it?
I might be remarking on something entirely different,
I thought this (darker ambient occlusion) was the change that was having the effect

edit:
okay,I found it; I am using
ambient_occlusion_gamma=1.2
display_gamma = 2.4

But I changed texture packs and it looks very different now,
going back to using SummerfieldsTP it looks better.

Napiophelios wrote:I dont know but when you fly around the landscape kinda shimmers, especially tree leaves
Its kinda weird lookin but neat.

Does #display_gamma = 1.8 have anything to do with it?
I might be remarking on something entirely different,
I thought this (darker ambient occlusion) was the change that was having the effect

edit:
okay,I found it; I am using
ambient_occlusion_gamma=1.2
display_gamma = 2.4

But I changed texture packs and it looks very different now,
going back to using SummerfieldsTP it looks better.

Ah okay, you are indeed using a darker ambient_occlusion_gamma value. (default is 2.2)

Well night time and dark places in general really seem dark now;
I dont know if these settings have anything to do with it,or maybe just the 0411 update,
but I dont get all the little white lines every where any more when I go into a cave.
Black looks black now.

Napiophelios wrote:Well night time and dark places in general really seem dark now;

You can change display_gamma to a lower value for brighter nights depending on your monitor. E.g. I use display_gamma = 1.5

The default is display_gamma = 1.8 and this gives the exact same brightness values as version 0.4.10 of minetest