bwog wrote:I would try it but I'm assuming I'd have to compile it. Could you take a screenshot and post it here?
bwog wrote:From those images, it doesn't work very well. There's too much "ghosting". (Seeing the image twice, therefore making it not look 3d)
jn wrote:bwog wrote:From those images, it doesn't work very well. There's too much "ghosting". (Seeing the image twice, therefore making it not look 3d)
Are you looking through anaglyph 3D glasses?
bwog wrote:jn wrote:bwog wrote:From those images, it doesn't work very well. There's too much "ghosting". (Seeing the image twice, therefore making it not look 3d)
Are you looking through anaglyph 3D glasses?
Yes.
jordan4ibanez wrote:bwog wrote:jn wrote:Are you looking through anaglyph 3D glasses?
Yes.
deeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeerp
VanessaE wrote:*looks again*
Oops, you're right. I just can't get my eyes to converge the two fields properly because they're too widely separated. Probably a good idea to make that adjustable too :)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests