Page 1 of 1

Compiling on Windows 7 vs Ubuntu

PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 17:36
by rubenwardy
I have both Visual C++ 2010 (Windows 7) and Codeblocks (Ubuntu).

Which one is easier to setup and compile on?

PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 18:20
by rubenwardy
Ubuntu, w/o codeblocks

PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 23:37
by cornernote
Windows took me about 2 to 3 hours to download all the stuff you need and get my first working build (no sound). Linux took about 5 minutes to do a build. Maybe 15 if you count the package download time.

PostPosted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 17:51
by tinoesroho
Took me about 20 minutes to do a build on Windows. Linux was shorter - a mere five.

PostPosted: Wed Sep 26, 2012 00:33
by cornernote
Took you a lot less than me on windows. It was my first time compiling anything.

PostPosted: Wed Sep 26, 2012 18:43
by Phitherek_
On Windows try MinGW and MSYS. Compiles just like in Linux ;). The one drawback are the dependencies - you must compile them yourself.

PostPosted: Thu Sep 27, 2012 06:57
by Calinou
Phitherek_ wrote:On Windows try MinGW and MSYS. Compiles just like in Linux ;). The one drawback are the dependencies - you must compile them yourself.


And it's a big drawback. I gave up about compiling on Windows and I installed Debian in VirtualBox instead, personally. :P

PostPosted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 03:21
by madchicken13
Yes I spent 2 Days trying to compile on Windows, so I installed Edubuntu 12.04 and It was the easiest compling I have ever done (5 Minutes at the most!)
Windows < Ubuntu
Windows Sucks!!!!!