One thing I've noticed while moving through dungeons or caverns....
Holding a torch does NOT produce light until placed.
This means you have to put a torch up to see your surroundings while exploring. Annoying if you come across a DM or Okekai (black spector) in the drakness. Yes, DMs light things up but that means you being fireballed.
Programming wise, you become the light source if holding the torch. Lights out if you switch to sword or pickaxe.
A tactic that could be used is have only one torch, find something ... mob or ore; place then switch to pickaxe or weapon.
Still I find not having light when holding a torch annoying.
FOSS gamedev and creative worlds
This is a mostly frozen copy of the Minetest forums through 2017. If you know phpBB3 and would like to host any G-rated forum here, you can email: me@minetest.org If the email doesn't work, find out who's taken over Final Minetest from OldCoder and email them to get write access or an admin account.
I should have set this up years ago. But it's no tale of woe.
Whether the temperature is high or low, regardless of cold winds blow,
away we go like Edgar Allan Poe, on now with the show. BTW rhymes are welcome.
Torch light - feature or problem?
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
-
neko259 - Member
- Posts: 769
- Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2011 06:51
That's a feature. There's no dynamic lightning in minetest.
Bitcoin donations: 18r66dJmUjwTmWRTFnorpGMzs8d4B8jzbw
-
dannydark - Member
- Posts: 428
- Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2011 21:28
What sfan5 linked above was done quite some time ago but was never accepted upstream as celeron55 didn't like the approach taken in that patch. iirc it caused to much lag on older hardware.
-
neko259 - Member
- Posts: 769
- Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2011 06:51
dannydark wrote:What sfan5 linked above was done quite some time ago but was never accepted upstream as celeron55 didn't like the approach taken in that patch. iirc it caused to much lag on older hardware.
Emm, why not make it optional with option in menu and config?
Bitcoin donations: 18r66dJmUjwTmWRTFnorpGMzs8d4B8jzbw
-
dannydark - Member
- Posts: 428
- Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2011 21:28
neko259 wrote:dannydark wrote:What sfan5 linked above was done quite some time ago but was never accepted upstream as celeron55 didn't like the approach taken in that patch. iirc it caused to much lag on older hardware.
Emm, why not make it optional with option in menu and config?
Don't know, I may be wrong you would have to ask Tango or Celeron55 >_<
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests