FOSS gamedev and creative worlds

by **Casimir** » Sat Sep 07, 2013 08:57

This is a fork of minetest_game.
Every pullrequest will get merged if
1. at least one other person agrees
2. no one disagrees (with reason*).
*personal taste is not a reason.

github: https://github.com/CasimirKaPazi/minetest_game

This is an experiment open for everyone, and I wont do anything except pressing the "merge pullrequest" button.

by **PenguinDad** » Sat Sep 07, 2013 09:29

Cool Idea :)

by **Nore** » Sat Sep 07, 2013 10:21

I already made 2 pull requests ;)

by **Casimir** » Thu Sep 12, 2013 17:10

At first I wanted to make the "number of people needed to agree" three. But it seems that even one is to much...

by **hoodedice** » Thu Sep 12, 2013 17:21

Wait.

https://forum.minetest.net/viewtopic.php?id=7033

What's the difference?

by **rubenwardy** » Thu Sep 12, 2013 17:33

This is the lua minetest_game.

That is the c++ engine.

by **Menche** » Thu Sep 12, 2013 19:12

There's a lot of neat requests for the official minetest_game that haven't been merged. Some I use and recommend:
New gravel texture
Add an Obsidian Brick
Add a inventory to bookshelf
Make the default:grass texture tile better
Add new_style_glass
Implemented facedir in the nyan cat rainbow
Added a caped player model

by **Menche** » Wed Sep 18, 2013 20:51

*poke poke*
This still alive? Going to be making a few more commits here.

by **Casimir** » Mon Sep 23, 2013 17:18

Menche wrote:This still alive?

It has yet to come alive.

Maybe there is a misunderstanding. By "agree" I mean making a comment on github, so it is visible that someone agrees on the pullrequest.
I'm wondering, is it that "at least one other person agrees" makes people not wanting to put the thumb up because that feels like being the only having the ultimate voice? What I want to say is, would it be better to have "at least three people agree"?

FOSS gamedev and creative worlds

[Game] commit on consensus [minetest_game]

[Game] commit on consensus [minetest_game]

Who is online