nrz wrote:Maybe we should have a coreside protection, [...]
Linuxdirk wrote:Preferably before implementing client-side modding makes all other security features useless.
sofar wrote:What again is your problem?
sofar wrote:CSM can't even send anything to the server. It can't dig a node. It can't clip through doors, it can't even lag through protection blocks!
DS-minetest wrote:bigfoot547: Is it acceptable now?
Linuxdirk wrote:sofar wrote:What again is your problem?
The lack of communication to the users about CSM.
The lack of any security features regarding CSM.
The lack of proper documentation for CSM.
The lack of a function for server owners to disable CSM.
etc.
Linuxdirk wrote:The lack of communication to the users about CSM.
Linuxdirk wrote:The lack of any security features regarding CSM.
Linuxdirk wrote:The lack of proper documentation for CSM.
Linuxdirk wrote:The lack of a function for server owners to disable CSM.
Linuxdirk wrote:sofar wrote:CSM can't even send anything to the server. It can't dig a node. It can't clip through doors, it can't even lag through protection blocks!
Can it set inventory slots? Or is the inventory completely server-side? Can it place nodes that somehow will "leak through" to the server?
ExeterDad wrote:So will server owners be able to prevent this mod from use on their server?
Linuxdirk wrote:sofar wrote:What again is your problem?
The lack of communication to the users about CSM.
The lack of any security features regarding CSM.
The lack of proper documentation for CSM.
The lack of a function for server owners to disable CSM.
etc.sofar wrote:CSM can't even send anything to the server. It can't dig a node. It can't clip through doors, it can't even lag through protection blocks!
Can it set inventory slots? Or is the inventory completely server-side? Can it place nodes that somehow will "leak through" to the server?
ExeterDad wrote:ExeterDad wrote:So will server owners be able to prevent this mod from use on their server?
I am very sorry I asked this question. I had no idea it would of caused such a sh*tstorm
red-001 wrote:Linuxdirk wrote:sofar wrote:What again is your problem?
The lack of communication to the users about CSM.
The lack of any security features regarding CSM.
The lack of proper documentation for CSM.
The lack of a function for server owners to disable CSM.
etc.sofar wrote:CSM can't even send anything to the server. It can't dig a node. It can't clip through doors, it can't even lag through protection blocks!
Can it set inventory slots? Or is the inventory completely server-side? Can it place nodes that somehow will "leak through" to the server?
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/bl ... lua_api.md
Linuxdirk wrote:Can it set inventory slots? Or is the inventory completely server-side? Can it place nodes that somehow will "leak through" to the server?sofar wrote:CSM can't even send anything to the server. It can't dig a node. It can't clip through doors, it can't even lag through protection blocks!
Linuxdirk wrote:
The file – like the regular API documentation file – unfortunately is an unmaintainable and unreadable mess. Please point out the exact line numbers that clarify all of my concerns.
sofar wrote:[Insulting bullshit]
sofar wrote:I can't point to lines that do not exist.
Linuxdirk wrote:Linuxdirk wrote:[qoute from sofar]
The lack of communication to the users about CSM.
The lack of any security features regarding CSM.
The lack of proper documentation for CSM.
The lack of a function for server owners to disable CSM.
etc.sofar wrote:...
The file – like the regular API documentation file – unfortunately is an unmaintainable and unreadable mess. Please point out the exact line numbers that clarify all of my concerns.
Linuxdirk wrote:sofar wrote:[Insulting bullshit]
Is this an official statement endorsed by the whole dev team or is it just you being offensive?sofar wrote:I can't point to lines that do not exist.
That’s what I was asking for: A general description on what CSM is and what it not is. Instead you go around and blatantly insulting your users.
Linuxdirk wrote:sofar wrote:[Insulting bullshit]
Is this an official statement endorsed by the whole dev team or is it just you being offensive?sofar wrote:I can't point to lines that do not exist.
That’s what I was asking for: A general description on what CSM is and what it not is. Instead you go around and blatantly insulting your users.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests